Good stuff Alan.
I too continue to struggle with this under-developed MP, a port from MOM 05
with
"no" new features I can find. Regardless, are you guys seeing high-CPU
utilization on
your less-powered DC's. After my DC guys continue to complain about the
increase
in processor utilization and the "major" differences between the MOM 05
agent and the
07 agent in the context of processor utilization, I finally had an epiphany,
it appears to
me that basically 90% of the components within the 07 version of this MP are
"on" by
default, whereas, if you look at the 05 rules/monitors, a much lower
percentage of rules
are enabled by default.
Things that make you go.. hmmmmm.
-richard
Post by AlanNo, I was not aware that it was in five places. I dug a little deeper and
have overidden the "IntersiteExpectedMaxLatency" parameter for the following
1. AD Replication Performance Collection - Metric Replication
Latency:Average
2. AD Replication Performance Collection - Metric Replication
Latency:Maximum
3. AD Replication Performance Collection - Metric Replication Latency
4. AD Replication Performance Collection - Metric Replication
Latency:Minimum
1. AD Replication Monitoring
All five now have the same value for the parameter. I will continue to
monitor once the changes are pushed to the agents. I've been stumped by this
one for several days, thanks for the tip!
-Alan
Post by Robin DrakeHave you understood that thresholds for AD Replication latencies have to be
overriden in 5 separate places identically? If you fail to do so the 5
wrkflows will work independently with their own values. (1 Monitor + 4
rules allfor AD Replication)
Post by AlanHehe, I was hoping you wouldn't say that. One more question. I'm runing SCOM
side by side with MOM 2005 which is also running the AD MP. Could this be
posing an issue? MOM 2005 is currently reporting correctly on AD replication,
only SCOM return incorrect alerts for replication.
Thanks,
Alan
Post by Thomas CRand all the objects are getting updated ? old servers are not automatic
deleted.
As I read you response, the objects are gettings updated, but you
still
get
the errors. Then I would call PSS. :-)
--
BR
Thomas CR
Post by AlanYes, I verified permissions and the Action account has the right to modify
the objects. I also verified that the MOMLatencyMonitors objects are getting
updated; each one has a current timestamp for both the whenChanged and
modifyTimeStamp attributes. In addition, these attribute values
change
within
acceptable timeframes for the settings on the monitor.
I'm stumped on this one. I even increased the latency thresholds to
2
hours
and it still triggers alerts even though repadmin shows latency
below
15
minutes for IntraSite. My DC's are all connected via MPLS with the branch
offices having a T3 and the hub sites having a 45Mb pipe. It's not a true
latency issue; however, the alert continuously triggers as if there were
issues with latency.
-Alan
Post by Thomas CRhave you checked that the Action account have the right permission
to
update
the object, that is used to check replication.
have you also tried to check the obejcts to see if they gets updated.
--
BR
Thomas CR
Post by AlanI contiously receive this alert as well as the related "AD
Replication is
slower than the configured threshold" event; however, every time
I
verify
replication using "repadmin /replsum /bysrc /bydest /sort:delta" I
confirm
that all domain controllers are replicating (InterSite) within 15
minutes.
I even tried bumping up the threshold to 30 and 45 minutes on the
alert, but
I still get reported latencies of up to 50 minutes which is not
accurate of
actual replication latencies which are all well within both the
15
minute
IntraSite and 5 minute IntraSite values.
Any ideas? Am I missing something within the Overrides for these
alerts?
Thanks in advance,
Alan